The Great Debate Essentialism Vs. Dominance - 1138 Words

Beep, Beep look out there’s a woman on the road. Often time’s women are stereotyped as a bad driver. In the article â€Å"The Great Debate: Essentialism vs. Dominance,† Courtney Stoker argues that there is a difference in communication between men and women through two theories. The Essentialism theory is the thought that men and women communicate differently due to their natural instincts as the Dominance theory imposes that the difference in communication is due to men’s perceived dominance (Stoker 676). As Stoker compares these theories she makes it clear that neither had substantial evidence in explaining the differences of gender communication. As Stoker stated, â€Å"But once again, I do not feel as if there is enough evidence to consciously declare one theory correct† (679). Stoker suggests the two main theories about why men and women communicate differently are flawed. Stoker is correct that these two theories do not explain every differenc e of men and women as they demonstrate behaviors in driving that do not specifically fall into these theories. First of all men and women drive differently because they show different amounts of aggression. Aggressive drivers are best known for putting someone else in danger or harm’s way while driving. This type of behavior is found more in men than women while driving. For example, â€Å"When it comes to aggressive driving, however, the majority (54 percent) of drivers cite men as the most likely culprits of aggressive driving. ComparedShow MoreRelatedExistentialism vs Essentialism23287 Words   |  94 Pages------------------------------------------------- Essentialism vs. Existentialism Essentialism: A belief that things have a set of characteristics that make them what they are, amp; that the task of science and philosophy is their discovery amp; expression; the doctrine that essence is prior to existence While, Existentialism:A philosophical theory or approach, that emphasizes the existence of the individual person as a free amp; responsible